From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-16 07:24:40
Joel de Guzman wrote:
> It seems worthwhile to actually go for a library proposal. Do you guys think that
> the utility is a good candidate for a fast-track review?
I think one of the criteria is that it has to be in use by one or more
Boost libraries already as an implementation detail. Is it, yet?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk