Re: [boost] Regressions on Linux

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-20 09:35:47

On Monday 20 October 2003 09:49 am, Martin Wille wrote:
> No changes and no comments from the respective maintainers since then,
> except for Boost.Function (which uses a slightly modified test now).
>
> Is this kind of report welcome on this list? Or would the
> respective maintainers prefer to be contacted off-list?

I do appreciate this kind of report on the list. I think the reason that 
little has changed is that most of the libraries with problems have 
maintainers that are only somewhat inactive, and perhaps don't follow the 
list very closely. I don't know if we should contact them directly, or just 
hope that someone else will come by to fix it.

        Doug