Re: [boost] Regressions on Linux

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-20 08:49:14

10 days ago, I wrote

> Currently, these regressions on Linux exist (see
> http://tinyurl.com/k36t ):
> 
> CRC
>   - crc_test regresses for gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.2.3
> 
> Graph
>   - graph regresses for gcc-2.95.3
> 
> Multi_array
>   - slice, iterators, compare, index_bases, stl_interaction,
>     constructors, assign, concept_checks, reshape, access,
>     storage order regress for gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.5.3
> 
> Random
>   - random_test and random_demo regress for gcc-2.95.3
> 
> 
> 
> Some tests fail for all or most of the compilers:
> 
> Function
>   - sum_avg_portable fails for all compilers
> 
> Math
>   - octonion_test and quaternion_test fail for all compilers.
> 
> Type_traits
>   - tricky_is_enum_test fails for all compilers
> 
> Test
>   - errors_handling_test fails for all compilers

No changes and no comments from the respective maintainers since then,
except for Boost.Function (which uses a slightly modified test now).

Is this kind of report welcome on this list? Or would the
respective maintainers prefer to be contacted off-list?

Regards,
m