From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-20 08:49:14
10 days ago, I wrote
> Currently, these regressions on Linux exist (see
> http://tinyurl.com/k36t ):
> - crc_test regresses for gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.2.3
> - graph regresses for gcc-2.95.3
> - slice, iterators, compare, index_bases, stl_interaction,
> constructors, assign, concept_checks, reshape, access,
> storage order regress for gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.5.3
> - random_test and random_demo regress for gcc-2.95.3
> Some tests fail for all or most of the compilers:
> - sum_avg_portable fails for all compilers
> - octonion_test and quaternion_test fail for all compilers.
> - tricky_is_enum_test fails for all compilers
> - errors_handling_test fails for all compilers
No changes and no comments from the respective maintainers since then,
except for Boost.Function (which uses a slightly modified test now).
Is this kind of report welcome on this list? Or would the
respective maintainers prefer to be contacted off-list?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk