From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-21 20:20:16
> (see "Thoughts on partial_random_shuffle" thread) that has generated
> some dicussion on creating a boost::algorithm library.
> Beman Dawes wrote:
> > There are a couple of other algorithm oriented libraries in the
> > boost-sandbox CVS in directories libs/sequence_algo and
> > libs/string_algo. There is also a libs/linear_sort.
> > Perhaps we should have boost/algorithm and libs/algorithm directories.
> > boost/algorithm would could eventually contain headers like
> > partial_random_shuffle.hpp, linear_sort.hpp, and string.hpp.
> > Likewise, libs/algorithm would have sub-directories
> > partial_random_shuffle, linear_sort, and string. Each of these
> > sub-directories would contain the usual doc, example, test directories.
> > Or if the library is really small, just the files themselves.
> > That way we have a coherent organization for smallish algorithm
> > libraries even though development is a separate effort for each
> > --Beman
I certainly think it is a great idea. Not so long ago we made some initial
for the sequence_algo stuff that tried to merge them all into one library.
> The question is how do we proceed with this idea? Can we have a formal
> review for boost::algorithm without any content or just make it an
> suggestion for the current algorithms under review?
Well, for the string algortihms, I don't the word "smallish" fits very well.
It might be fine to
release it on its own.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk