From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-23 04:43:53
"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
It occurs to me that what is needed is a run-time analog of
at<>, which has the same signature as get<> for tuples.
Then I wouldn't need to convert to a tuple (though tuples do
have a nice interface). How hard would that be?
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk