Boost logo

Boost :

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-23 04:43:53

"David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> [...]
> get<3>(f.v);
> [...]

It occurs to me that what is needed is a run-time analog of
at<>, which has the same signature as get<> for tuples.
Then I wouldn't need to convert to a tuple (though tuples do
have a nice interface). How hard would that be?


Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at