From: Hugo Duncan (hugoduncan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-23 12:10:08
David B. Held <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It occurs to me that what is needed is a run-time analog of
> at<>, which has the same signature as get<> for tuples.
> Then I wouldn't need to convert to a tuple (though tuples do
> have a nice interface). How hard would that be?
Not sure this is exactly what you want, but I posted some code
that allowed runtime indexing into a mpl sequence.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk