From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-23 20:58:29
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > I believe this was made because of the way regex interfaces were done. I
> > couldn't find any rationale for this
> > in the regex docs. Can anybody explain this?
> As far as regex is concerned there are parameters that need to have
> values, so these naturally came last. Interestingly this issue didn't
> up during the TR1 regex submission.
Does "interesting" means "we shouldn'tt bother discuss this" or "why didn't
we see this while working on the TR1" ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk