From: Eric Friedman (ebf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-23 21:18:43
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Douglas Paul Gregor writes:
>>>Oh, duh. This is what Haskell calls "uncurry". Wow! Ok, so the long
>>>and the short of it is that I should be writing
>>> |= case<Add>( uncurry( eval(_1)+eval(_2) ) )
>>Ah ha! That's the right term. Even if the rest of this discussion goes
>>nowhere, we should probably write uncurry...
> We are almost there already:
> uncurry(f)(t) === apply(f,t)
> where 'apply' is available from here - http://tinyurl.com/s0g6.
Why wasn't there any response to this! (Yes, I'm guilty, too.) Anyhow,
eight months later, I still think this should be added :)
It would help with some other things I'm trying to do, too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk