From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-24 07:09:37
Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
> [2003-10-23] Brian McNamara wrote:
>>On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:07:34PM -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
>>> Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> > 3. I'll gladly add ASAP, in which case; Is "unused_variable" a
>>> > name?
>>> Reasonable, though "no_unused_warning" might be more self-documenting.
>>Everyone has opinions about names, so I'll share mine.
>>I think something long like
>>In fact, I don't know if there are other types of warnings people try to
>>disable with code-tricks like these, but it might even make sense to
>>make it be
>>Even if this is the only such entity, I kinda like the way the code
>>reads with the "::" in it. In general, anything in the
>>"disable_warning" namespace would be "code with no effect" stuff like
> I kinda like the disable_warning:: version also... As it lets you also:
> using namespace boost::disable_warning;
So then usage reads:
I think this is getting too fancy.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk