|
|
Boost : |
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-25 18:06:14
At 05:20 AM 10/24/2003, Pavol Droba wrote:
>I think, that the most important would be to factor out common parts,
>so that they can be reused and to agree on an interface convention (like
>naming, algorithm signatures, namespaces and etc.)
>
>Once these issues are fixed, all parts can coexists, yet thay can be
>maintained as a separate libraries.
>This would be IMHO even better, because one big bundle can get be hard to
>maintain.
Yes. We need an organization that appears unified to users, but can be
maintained by developers as if dealing with separate libraries.
--Beman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk