From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-25 18:06:14
At 05:20 AM 10/24/2003, Pavol Droba wrote:
>I think, that the most important would be to factor out common parts,
>so that they can be reused and to agree on an interface convention (like
>naming, algorithm signatures, namespaces and etc.)
>Once these issues are fixed, all parts can coexists, yet thay can be
>maintained as a separate libraries.
>This would be IMHO even better, because one big bundle can get be hard to
Yes. We need an organization that appears unified to users, but can be
maintained by developers as if dealing with separate libraries.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk