From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-24 04:20:37
I think, that the most important would be to factor out common parts,
so that they can be reused and to agree on an interface convention (like naming,
algorithm signatures, namespaces and etc.)
Once these issues are fixed, all parts can coexists, yet thay can be maintained
as a separate libraries.
This would be IMHO even better, because one big bundle can get be hard to maintain.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 09:24:22AM +0100, Craig Henderson wrote:
> Well, they're are the same, because sequence_algo is generic and independent
> of data type, not just for strings. But there are, of course, overlaps,
> hence my comment in response to an algorithms library. I think that is a
> better approach - one algorithms library which can then encompass String
> Algo, Sequence Algo, Container Algo and more in the future.
> -- Craig
> "Pavol Droba" <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > When this will be about tho happen, I'll be more then willing to
> > elaborate. It is natural to combine these two libaries under one roof.
> > Pavol
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk