From: Jessie Hernandez (jessie_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-26 13:46:32
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> I think there was a member function which was called proto(). Shouldn't
> you be able to rename that?
Actually, no. I just tried it on gcc and it gave me compile errors. This is
because the service::proto() member function returns a protocol&. If I name
the member function the same, then it will cause ambiguity for the compiler
(I wanted to name it protocol() too, but I ran into this same issue when I
initially wrote the service class).
-- Jessie Hernandez
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk