From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-01 15:03:36
Pavol Droba <droba_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Question is there what should be the future of the iterator_range?
> - use it only internaly by string_algo library (and possibly rename it
> to find_result)
> - move it outside as a separate utility
> - replace it with something else.
> Current possibilities are half_open_range and std::pair.
> There are oher issues that has been risen during this review.
> I will address them later, when the library will be ready for inclusion.
I think it should be moved outside and documented as a separate
utility. It's valuable to be able to pass containers around. It
would be good if you'd look over the functionality of half_open_range
and see if there's anything worth stealing.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk