Re: [boost] Re: String Algo Review Results

From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-02 07:31:59

On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 02:48:26AM -0600, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > > And for iterator_range, it's kind of double information when you
> > > write
> > >
> > > iterator_range< some_iterator >
> > >
> > > instead of
> > >
> > > range< some_iterator >.
> >
> > IMO "range" is too short and general a name to be reserved in boost
> > for half-open-range-of-iterators.
> 
> I am with Dave here. FWIW, our iterator range class at work is called, well,
> 'iterator_range' :).
> 

This seem very convincing :) I will keep the name "iterator_range" and support
functions will be ranamed to follow.

Pavol