From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-02 08:03:00
David Abrahams wrote:
> Misha Bergal <mbergal_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > 2. The python test fail if run as a part of status/jamfile - runs fine
> > if ran from libs/python/test (see log below)
It's easy to reproduce - include Boost.Python into the status/jamfile, and
you'll get what we are getting. We would appreciate if somebody with
adequate amount of bjam knoweledge could look at this in more detail -
apparently we don't have enough qualification to understand what's
happenning there, and certainly not enough time to get ourselves to that
> > 3. The requirement of unique test names across all libraries is really
> > hurting (see http://tinyurl.com/t88o).
> I believe this is a problem in the table generation script, not in the
> build system, correct?
Not exactly. 'process_jam_log' is at fault, here. Beman's reply was that
it's a feature, but it just doesn't seem to be practical or reasonable to
maintain that requirement.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk