Boost logo

Boost :

From: Fredrik Blomqvist (fredrik_blomqvist_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-11 17:08:54

Robert Ramey wrote:
> Firingme wrote:
>> Platform: Win XP SP1
>> Compiler: VS2003
>> TestCode : "demo.cpp" with serialization draft #13 release
>> Error Address:
>> file: greater.hpp
>> #if !defined(__BORLANDC__)
>> typedef bool_<value> type;
>> #else
>> typedef bool_<(
>> > (BOOST_MPL_AUX_VALUE_WKND(T2)::value)
>> )> type;
>> #endif
>> Error 2975
> I don't have VC 7.1 installed so I can't verify/fix/track this down
> this directly. This gets invoked by a higher level STATIC_ASSERT.
> Other users
> have just commented out the STATIC_ASSERT and moved on. If
> anyone can get to bottom of this and fix it please let me know so
> I can roll in the change.
> I suspect a couple of anomolies with VC 7.0 and VC 7.1 regarding
> mpl bool_ and if_ . Also I have some doubts about type traits
> is_fundamental<size_t>. I don't have VC 7.1 installed. I looked at
> the compiler status page and much
> to my disappointment I don't see any run of the mpl tests. mpl
> does have a complete test suite. Is there any reason that this
> test can't be included in the regression test run?
> Robert Ramey
> _______________________________________________

FYI; I believe I have a working patch for VC7.1 that should allow a full
I'll try to run the complete tests tomorrow and isolate changes before I
post it.

(To the MPL experts: IIUC the core-problems are found in level.hpp &
I'd say a 'clean' solution needs to do similar workarounds here as MPL does
in it's integral-constant code)

//Fredrik Blomqvist

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at