From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-12 04:10:28
Robert Ramey wrote:
> Firingme wrote:
> >Platform: Win XP SP1
> >Compiler: VS2003
> >TestCode : "demo.cpp" with serialization draft #13 release
> >Error Address:
> >file: greater.hpp
> >#if !defined(__BORLANDC__)
> > typedef bool_<value> type;
> > typedef bool_<(
> > (BOOST_MPL_AUX_VALUE_WKND(T1)::value)
> > > (BOOST_MPL_AUX_VALUE_WKND(T2)::value)
> > )> type;
> >Error 2975
> I don't have VC 7.1 installed so I can't verify/fix/track this down
> this directly. This gets invoked by a higher level STATIC_ASSERT.
> Other users have just commented out the STATIC_ASSERT and moved on.
> If anyone can get to bottom of this and fix it please let me know so
> I can roll in the change.
> I suspect a couple of anomolies with VC 7.0 and VC 7.1 regarding
> mpl bool_ and if_ .
> Also I have some doubts about type traits is_fundamental<size_t>.
> I don't have VC 7.1 installed. I looked at the compiler status page
> and much to my disappointment I don't see any run of the mpl tests.
Here - http://tinyurl.com/t88o.
> mpl does have a complete test suite. Is there any reason that this
> test can't be included in the regression test run?
It is included into our (MetaCommunications Engineering) nighly runs.
The original motivation for not including them into 'status/jamfile'
(and, therefore, other runner's results) by default is available here -
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk