Boost logo

Boost :

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-17 17:40:52

"Philippe A. Bouchard" wrote:
> Microsoft's compiler seems to support more than 1 processor... even more
> efficiently: [gack! snip snip snip]

For *efficiency*, you really want to have NAKED increments for smart
pointers with basic thread-safety. FWIW, the current Wintel stuff in
this respect is brain-dead. Totally.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at