[boost] Re: problem with shared_ptr

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-17 17:40:52

"Philippe A. Bouchard" wrote:
[...]
> Microsoft's compiler seems to support more than 1 processor... even more
> efficiently: [gack! snip snip snip]

For *efficiency*, you really want to have NAKED increments for smart 
pointers with basic thread-safety. FWIW, the current Wintel stuff in 
this respect is brain-dead. Totally. 

regards,
alexander.