From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippeb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-17 18:09:06
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> "Philippe A. Bouchard" wrote:
>> Microsoft's compiler seems to support more than 1 processor... even
>> more efficiently: [gack! snip snip snip]
> For *efficiency*, you really want to have NAKED increments for smart
> pointers with basic thread-safety. FWIW, the current Wintel stuff in
> this respect is brain-dead. Totally.
Obviously the smart pointer will need to run on SPARC servers for
multithreaded environments. It looked like shared_count_x86_exp2.cpp
coudn't run on multiple platforms.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk