From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-18 19:50:03
"Pavol Droba" <droba_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> I might find some time to do it. After all, it is needed for the
> and putting it to ConceptCheck library makes much more sense.
> Maybe I can provide concept checking classes and you can move
Collection.html to the proper
> place and adapt the docs...
I have no problems with moving and adopting Jeremy's .html into the current
docs. I just need his permission.
> > droba> 2. Is the "swap" requirement so important, that it eventualy
> > droba> couldn't be relaxed?
> > Yeah, relaxing it makes sense... probably the thing to do is remove the
> > swap req from Collection, and then have another concept called Swappable
> > Collection.
> Good Idea.
> Then there is nothing in the way to adopt this concept as a reference for
> And it seems, that it will make sense to rename container_traits to
I agree that collection_traits make more sense.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk