From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-23 08:30:52
Brian McNamara <lorgon_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > I think I need arguments other than that is how Haskell do it.
| I agree that "how language X does it" does not mean that C++ ought to do
| it the same way. (As you have pointed out, C++ is rather different from
| most other languages in a variety of important respects.)
| On the other hand, I do think it is useful to consider how other
| languages have done something, as it may provide useful insight into
| how to solve the problem.
I agree. Thta is a reason wy we found the comparative study done by
Garcia et al. very useful.
| order to make an informed decision. In lieu of that experience,
| however, I do think it's useful to do some of the type of debating we're
| doing here (about theoretical merit/demerits of various approaches, what
| other languages have done, etc.).
Yes. And it is instructive to read other people's opinions on the
issue. I just wanted to make sure that the design criteria are kept in
the fore. It might be that the criteria are impossible to satisfy at
the same time, but I think they should not be forgotten. Probably, we
may end up with cutting down the list of criteria but we need to start
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk