From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-25 12:12:41
Markus Werle <numerical.simulation_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Markus Werle <numerical.simulation_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> I am not going to support VC6 anyway, but for Borland ...
>> I suggest you may have got it backwards.
> My neglection of VC6 has political reasons :-)
>> It's *much* harder to get
>> Borland to jump through many template hoops correctly than it is vc6.
>> That's ameliorated somewhat by MPL, but not even all of MPL supports
>> Borland IIUC (lambda exprs).
> But then: why support it anyway?
I'm not saying you should (although IMO there are obvious reasons to
do so, which of course may not outweigh the costs for you)
> Considering the retard while designing the racing car
> makes no sense to me.
Using term in English can be quite offensive to some. I assume you
didn't mean it that way.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk