From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-26 08:38:55
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 1) Does the _latest_ version of Borland C++
>> still have some of the issues described in
> There is an open Beta that's fixed, but yes the latest version still has
> those defects.
>> 2) Are there any estimates about the percentage
>> of Borland C++ compiler users compared to Intel C++
>> and GNU-g++-3.4?
>> (The 2 compilers I plan to support in all case)
> Who knows, however if you drop support for vc6, then following the guideline
> for Borland (using fully qualified names for integral constant expressions),
> should be supported by all the other compilers.
I would rather recommend that people use MPL integral constant
wrappers. That makes nearly all of these workarounds disappear and
makes the code much cleaner.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk