Re: [boost] int_const_guidelines out of date?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-26 06:33:50

> 1) Does the _latest_ version of Borland C++
> still have some of the issues described in
> http://www.boost.org/more/int_const_guidelines.htm?

There is an open Beta that's fixed, but yes the latest version still has
those defects.

> 2) Are there any estimates about the percentage
> of Borland C++ compiler users compared to Intel C++
> and GNU-g++-3.4?
> (The 2 compilers I plan to support in all case)

Who knows, however if you drop support for vc6, then following the guideline
for Borland (using fully qualified names for integral constant expressions),
should be supported by all the other compilers.

John.