From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-27 15:43:23
I'd also agree that it is most desirable to be able to blow a ISO9660 standard
CD of Boost:
level 2 (max filename 31 chars). max pathdept 8, max 255 chars in path.
At present this is not possible because of lots of messages like
and Joliet names of class132.htm (listed in ISO-=L3) are the same
(Using Nero 184.108.40.206)
I suspect this is easy to fix,
and worth keeping the 31 char limit and trying to keep the path depth below 7 if
possible to give users a holding directoyr.
Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Nicolas Fleury
| Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:18 PM
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: [boost] Re: Do we still care about file names > 31 characters?
| Reid Sweatman wrote:
| > Minor cavil: when you burn to CD, that's still the max name length, and
| > some of us like to run Boost from a CD in expanded form, at least, for the
| > documentation aspect. But maybe I'm completely in the minority.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk