From: Reid Sweatman (drunkardswalk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-28 16:25:38
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Garland
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 5:58 PM
> To: Boost mailing list
> Subject: RE: [boost] Re: Do we still care about file names >
> 31 characters?
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 20:43:23 -0000, Paul A. Bristow wrote
> > I'd also agree that it is most desirable to be able to blow a
> > ISO9660 standard CD of Boost:
> > level 2 (max filename 31 chars). max pathdept 8, max 255 chars in
> > path.
> > At present this is not possible because of lots of messages like
> > classboost_1_1date_time_1_1all__date__names__put__coll__graph.png
> This file is not part of the boost distribution -- it is a
> file generated by running doxygen on boost date_time. If you
> need short
> names doxygen can be set to generate short filenames. Also, I
> recommend that
> if you want to burn this onto a CD zip it first.
Sure, you can do that, but my original point was that I run a *lot* of
documentation, Boost included, from CDs. If it's zipped, it's just an
archive, not an immediately usable and portable tool. But as I said, I just
tossed the thought out for discussion; I can work with whatever the majority
(or the guy who has to do the work) decides.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk