From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-01 10:31:00
At 05:21 PM 11/29/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>Doesn't seem to provide enough ambiguity resolution. What if we have
>two tests with the same name?
Ah! It was implemented before we allowed duplicate test names.
>Also, I'd like to be able to say, "any toolset which fails this test
>gets note X". We have a few tests in the iterators library which
>should get the new note "this failure is not serious and won't affect
>most users; the library degrades gracefully", whenever they fail.
Seems like this is really two features:
A) Note applies only if test fails.
B) Note applies regardless of toolset.
These features are not mutually exclusive; either or both can apply.
I'll implement all of the above later today. They will require format
changes to the map file, but that shouldn't be a problem.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk