From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-01 21:10:01
At 10:31 AM 12/1/2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
>At 05:21 PM 11/29/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> >// toolset/test-name,note-#
> >// toolset/*library-name,note-#
> >Doesn't seem to provide enough ambiguity resolution. What if we have
> >two tests with the same name?
>Ah! It was implemented before we allowed duplicate test names.
> >Also, I'd like to be able to say, "any toolset which fails this test
> >gets note X". We have a few tests in the iterators library which
> >should get the new note "this failure is not serious and won't affect
> >most users; the library degrades gracefully", whenever they fail.
>Seems like this is really two features:
>A) Note applies only if test fails.
>B) Note applies regardless of toolset.
>These features are not mutually exclusive; either or both can apply.
>I'll implement all of the above later today. They will require format
>changes to the map file, but that shouldn't be a problem.
OK, all done and committed to CVS. See comments in
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk