[boost] Re: Expected Errors?

From: AlisdairM (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-01 11:50:02

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in
news:un0acfr3o.fsf_at_[hidden]: 

> Sounds like an example of the former.

You are correct of course.  Looks like I read the original message back-to-
front.

Would boost::function be an example of the latter?  It is usable on 
Borland/older MSVC with the deprecated functionX syntax, but the tr1 
version is entirely unsupported.

[It would be quite nice to see these 2 separate implementations separated 
out in the test pages, but I'm not sure what would be involved.  Would it 
be as simple as renaming a couple of tests?]

AlisdairM