Re: [boost] Re: Expected Errors?

From: Douglas Paul Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-01 12:14:21

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, AlisdairM wrote:
> Would boost::function be an example of the latter?  It is usable on
> Borland/older MSVC with the deprecated functionX syntax, but the tr1
> version is entirely unsupported.
>
> [It would be quite nice to see these 2 separate implementations separated
> out in the test pages, but I'm not sure what would be involved.  Would it
> be as simple as renaming a couple of tests?]

The tests are sorted alphabetically, so we could just prefix all of the
tests with, say, portable_ or tr1_.

        Doug