[boost] Re: [Operators library] bool_testable

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-03 08:35:44

Daniel Frey <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Hello, world!
>
> I removed bool_testable from the CVS tree. I also updated the
> documentation to use the new license (*) and added a note about the
> portability (and non-standard-conformance) of the separate, explicit
> instantiation. Comments welcome.
>
> Please note, however, that removing bool_testable doesn't mean that I
> won't add it again in the future if we can solve the remaining
> issue(s). I was hoping for some more comments to
> <http://tinyurl.com/xi3x>, but AFAICS we still have no agreed-on
> solution, thus I cleaned the CVS to prevent releasing something we
> have to revoke later.
>
> Regards, Daniel
>
> (*) There was a copyright statement from Beman and Dave, both allowed
> me to change the license. I hope this was the correct way, but
> IANAL. Beman also gave a blank permission to change the license to the
> Boost Software License 1.0 for everything he holds a copyright on here
> at boost. I would hereby like to do the same. I wonder if it would
> make sense if we have a page where everyone can sign up so the
> maintainers have an easier job when moving to the new license.

Yes!  That's a super idea.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com