From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-03 08:53:25
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Do we need a separate config macro and a little test for this one?
> Unfortunately it looks like we do, further investigation reveals that the
> following statement:
> using boost::get_pointer;
> seems to poison ADL lookup for get_pointer in namespaces beneath boost,
> changing this to:
> using namespace boost;
> and you test case now compiles OK with this compiler!
> How about BOOST_POISONED_ADL_LOOKUP for want of a better name?
I think we can do better, but I need a better description of what
happens in order to get there. Can you give more details?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk