From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-10 03:11:48
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:36:19 +0100, Andy Little wrote:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > Ok I get the message.
>> What message?
> The quiet message is that there is not a great deal of interest in my
> physical-quantities type.
> Thats fine with me :-)
But there is interest. Although there is not much time :) I am currently
hoping for feedback on the constant library and I'll keep working on it.
Once I have finished the main parts of the documentation, I'd like to
have a closer look at quantity libraries and how they play together
with the constant library. It might also make sense to use the interval
library for physical quantities, I don't know yet. But all this won't
happen in a few days so don't hold your breath, just keep up working on
it. I still remember how long it took to add NRVO to the operators
library and this wasn't even a new library at all :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk