RE: [boost] Re: A better tokenizer?

From: Jon Kalb (jonkalb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-10 03:39:03

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of John Torjo
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:06 PM
> To: Boost mailing list
> Subject: Re: [boost] Re: A better tokenizer?
> 
> >>Basically, I realized the importance of single-pass. 
> Therefore, there 
> >>are two types of slicers (or tokenizers, if you like):
> >>- slice_byeach (which is single pass)
> >>- slice_byrng (which allows operating on a sub-range, in order to
> > 
> > 
> > What good is slicing done by a Random Number Generator?
> > 
> sorry, did not understand what you mean.

I think he is suggesting that slice_byrange (or slice_by_range) might be
a better name.

-- 
Jon Kalb