From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-10 16:47:19
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> >>Actually on compilers where it's needed, it seems to be safe (and
> >>occasionally neccessary) to use it everywhere except in the place
> >>labelled OK above. We really ought to change it to BOOST_TYPENAME.
Unfortunately, it's not that easy: bcc5.6.4 (but not 5.5.1) _requires_ it in
some places, while still ICEing at some deduced contexts.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk