From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-10 19:55:07
"Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
>> >>Actually on compilers where it's needed, it seems to be safe (and
>> >>occasionally neccessary) to use it everywhere except in the place
>> >>labelled OK above. We really ought to change it to BOOST_TYPENAME.
> Unfortunately, it's not that easy: bcc5.6.4 (but not 5.5.1) _requires_ it in
> some places, while still ICEing at some deduced contexts.
Actually, it's true of vc7 too I think. However, I only put it in
where some compiler complains, and I've never seen a case where all
the other compilers aren't happy with it. I think they must have
some bugs in common.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk