From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-13 07:52:48
> An enum type is a compound type. I think it would be best to say
> "not a fundamental type"
> as this is what the implementation looks like (see also 3.9/1). I think
> the remark about "requires partial specialization" in the docs for
> is_compound might also be wrong now and should be fixed, too. John?
Yes, thanks, changed in the docs.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk