RE: [boost] Numeric Conversion Formal Review

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-14 12:34:20

At 05:41 PM 12/13/2003, Paul A. Bristow wrote:

 >I only worry about the implications of C99 functions being included in 
the
 >C++ Standard library (as seems very likely). This will provide some 
useful,
 >but potentially overlapping functions.  Do we need to worry about this?
 >If it is now know to be accepted, it needs at least to be referenced.

FWIW, most of the new C99 functions will almost certainly be in the C++ 
Library Technical Report. They've already been approved in principle, with 
no dissenting votes, and Bill Plauger has volunteered to write the 
standardese.

--Beman