From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-14 12:34:20
At 05:41 PM 12/13/2003, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>I only worry about the implications of C99 functions being included in
>C++ Standard library (as seems very likely). This will provide some
>but potentially overlapping functions. Do we need to worry about this?
>If it is now know to be accepted, it needs at least to be referenced.
FWIW, most of the new C99 functions will almost certainly be in the C++
Library Technical Report. They've already been approved in principle, with
no dissenting votes, and Bill Plauger has volunteered to write the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk