From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-20 11:34:24
On Saturday 20 December 2003 06:12 am, John Maddock wrote:
> What were the gcc-2.95 issues?
Martin Wille reported this:
> config regresses for gcc2.95.3 and intel-7.1
> graph, random and test regress for gcc-2.95.3
> multi_array regresses for gcc-2.95.3-stlport.
> conversion regresses for intel-7.1
> A lot of python tests seem to fail.
Looks like graph, random, and test are the only ones that have failures; I'm
not sure which are regressions.
> However I think we should set a definite timetable for release now, how
> about branching right after Christmas with a release for early in the New
> Year? Depends a lot on how busy people are.
I'm happy so long as we don't drag this release out past January.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk