Re: [boost] Re: 1.31.0 progress report

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-20 11:34:24

On Saturday 20 December 2003 06:12 am, John Maddock wrote:
> What were the gcc-2.95 issues?

Martin Wille reported this:
> config regresses for gcc2.95.3 and intel-7.1
> graph, random and test regress for gcc-2.95.3
> multi_array regresses for gcc-2.95.3-stlport.
> conversion regresses for intel-7.1
> A lot of python tests seem to fail.

Looks like graph, random, and test are the only ones that have failures; I'm 
not sure which are regressions.

> However I think we should set a definite timetable for release now, how
> about branching right after Christmas with a release for early in the New
> Year?  Depends a lot on how busy people are.

I'm happy so long as we don't drag this release out past January.

        Doug