Re: [boost] Re: Interest in smart pointer with value semantics?

From: Johan Johansson (johanj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-04 16:14:19

David B. Held wrote:

>>1) Many people don't like that behavior
>>    
>>
> [...]
>
>
>So far, you're the only one here who's said so.  If there's so many
>other people who don't like that behavior, I wonder where they are?
>Mr. Wallin argues for deep const for deep copy, but I don't see him
>saying anything about shallow copy pointers.
>  
>

I certainly think the current separation between constness of the 
pointer and that which is pointed to is correct.

j