From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-05 15:11:30
At 11:47 AM 1/5/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
>>> If we do that, we can also ensure that BOOST_CONFIG #defines all of
>>> them (mostly to zero) and we can eliminate the issues with warnings
>>> from BOOST_WORKAROUND doing comparisons on macros which haven't been
>> I didn't realize there were such issues, but this is a good idea.
>Good. What do we do about intel 8.0 for the 1.31.0 release? Should
>we change all occurrences of __GNUC__ in the library? Sounds like a
>bad bet before the release...
I agree. We need to address the problem, but it will take time to do so
carefully, and then test whatever we do.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk