Re: [boost] Re: Intel C++ for Linux defines __GNUC__!!

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-05 16:01:58

On Monday 05 January 2004 03:42 pm, David Abrahams wrote:
> Douglas Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > Too dangerous, IMHO. Looking through the regression tests, there are only
> > two tests for which Intel 8.0 passes on Wintel but fails on Linux (and
> > also fail on GCC, so they're probably related to __GNUC__ being defined):
> > tricky_is_enum_test and interoperable_fail. I don't think it hurts us
> > much for 1.31.0, so we should just start making these changes on the main
> > trunk.
>
> I think we can probably nail those individually on the branch for this
> release, no?

Sure, are you volunteering? :)

        Doug