From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-05 17:43:05
Douglas Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Monday 05 January 2004 03:42 pm, David Abrahams wrote:
>> Douglas Gregor <gregod_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > Too dangerous, IMHO. Looking through the regression tests, there are only
>> > two tests for which Intel 8.0 passes on Wintel but fails on Linux (and
>> > also fail on GCC, so they're probably related to __GNUC__ being defined):
>> > tricky_is_enum_test and interoperable_fail. I don't think it hurts us
>> > much for 1.31.0, so we should just start making these changes on the main
>> > trunk.
>> I think we can probably nail those individually on the branch for this
>> release, no?
> Sure, are you volunteering? :)
Given enough time, sure.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk