Re: [boost] Re: Intel C++ for Linux defines __GNUC__!!

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-06 06:07:20

> Too dangerous, IMHO. Looking through the regression tests, there are only
two
> tests for which Intel 8.0 passes on Wintel but fails on Linux (and also
fail
> on GCC, so they're probably related to __GNUC__ being defined):
> tricky_is_enum_test and interoperable_fail. I don't think it hurts us much
> for 1.31.0, so we should just start making these changes on the main
trunk.

I agree, BTW I hope to commit a fix for the gcc failure with is_enum soon
(still testing).

John.