From: Guillaume Melquiond (guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-07 12:52:39
Le mer 07/01/2004 à 18:21, David Abrahams a écrit :
> Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > Le mer 07/01/2004 à 16:34, David Abrahams a écrit :
> >> http://tinyurl.com/39oby
> >> shows failures which seem entirely reasonable. AFAICT the standard
> >> contains no asinh or acosh functions. C99 has them, but C++ is based
> >> on C98.
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7706
> >> Verifies this (see the bottom of the message).
> >> What are we going to do about this?
> > It's only a matter of teaching interval/detail/bugs.hpp that the version
> > 3.4 of GCC (contrarily to previous versions and some other compilers)
> > doesn't know anything about std::a???h. I will commit a fix as soon as I
> > find a suitable version of GCC 3.4.
> You can always just check it in and watch the nightly test logs to
> see if it worked.
No, I needed to know if the functions had definitely been removed from
GCC (since the standard does not mandate them) or if they still were in
the root namespace. So I have installed GCC 3.4 and tested. A fix has
been committed, both to the main cvs and to the RC_1_31_0 branch, so
that the library looks for them in the correct namespace.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk