From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-09 04:33:37
Darren Cook wrote:
> Being able to say "boost.1.31" as a dependency for a program, instead of
> a list of sub-libraries and their versions, is very appealing.
So perhaps for existing libraries, after 1.31 is released, a set of
enhancements/bug fixes could be drawn up fairly early on for what will
go into each library for 1.32. That may gave a more defined target to
work towards for the next release. As for new libraries, that would
have to be thought about.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk