From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-09 05:41:54
"Jan Langer" <jan_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Andy Little wrote:
> > std::complex<q_impedance::R> Z=
> > std::complex<q_voltage::V>() / std::complex<q_current::I>().
> > No idea if that would actually work though.... Anybody ...?
> it is correct. but i would prefer
> typedef std::complex <double> value_type;
> voltage <value_type> v (value_type (2, 3));
> current <value_type> i (value_type (1, 4));
> impedance <value_type> z = v / i;
> my point is just that std::complex <double> is the value type and should
> replace your implicit (i know its only for convenience) double.
Will try to compile and see what happens
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk