From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-09 09:23:45
"Phil Richards" <news_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:51:59 +0000, Andy Little wrote:
> That may or may not be the case - the way I view these discussions is to
> try and get something in boost that does the job I need. I don't actually
> care very much whether it is written by Matthias, you, me, or somebody
> else :-) However, unless approaches are tried and publicised there never
> will be a library that does this job in boost - if what you have done
> works for you, then at least it is worth it for you - but it is also worth
> it to make other people *think* about the possibilities.
Sorry , sorry this discussion has been going on and on and on.
Basically I agree. At the moment the only one that I have acccess to that
works is mine :-)
I am very interested in your view.
Apologies again... tired... tired
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk