From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-09 10:24:19
Daniel Frey wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> I think we should start to discuss the possibility of having individual
>> releases (as Spirit is doing right now) instead of one monolithic
>> I'm sure you are all starting to feel the weight. At some point, when
>> assimilates more libraries, a monolithic release might take forever. This
>> seems to go against the open source mantra "release early, release
> FWIW, I like the release-frequency as it is. Few but well tested
> releases are what users need, see GCC or XFree86. "Release early,
> release often" is only good in the beginning, but there is another
> mantra: "Release when it's ready for release - not when your marketing
> department wants to".
Of course. Spirit does not have a marketing department. We do release
when it's ready for release. It just so happens that the cycle is
more frequent than boost's.
Thanks for your feedback.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk