From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-13 12:45:35
--- Pavel Vozenilek <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk_at_[hidden]> wrote
> > g++ (GCC) 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7)
> is_abstract should work only with latest GCC 3.4 fetched from CVS.
> The DR337 compliance was added by Giovanni Bajo few days ago.
It is very important to us that Boost.Python continues to work with existing
gcc's. Would it be possible to find a solution to this problem? E.g. could
is_abstract be ifdef'ed out on compilers where it doesn't work?
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk